Rotinas Full body

«Look, I don’t think anyone will argue that strength and conditioning programs for athletes should be designed on physiological basis. As Alwyn Cosgrove so eloquently put it:

“Part of the word 'physiological' is the word 'logical' and I argue that there is very little logic to body part splits. Body part splits are geography, not physiology!”

So how about training your body based on what it does, instead of what part it is? As your body functions and moves as a unit (as opposed to segmented parts), it only makes sense to avoid body part splits in athletic programs.

It’s very difficult to classify exercises by muscle groups anyway. For example, take the classic lunge. Most people will quantify this movement as a “quad” exercise, but your hips, glutes, lower back and abs, will have to maximally contract to prevent your knee from collapsing inward and your torso from tipping over. Your hamstrings also become involved to a greater degree if you lengthen your stride.

The more muscle groups you’re able to work in unison doing compound exercises and total body programming, the better off you’ll be athletically, and aesthetically.»

joca300 escreveu:Treinar até á falha um exercício e depois não se consegue fazer o resto...

twoenyman escreveu:Os melhores resultados que já tive na minha vida foi com treinos divididos e nunca treinar os mesmos músculos ou nem mesmo treinar todos os dias. Só é pena eu não saber como fazer aqui um upload de fotos mostrando o antes e o depois treinando de 2 em 2 dias .